How I Got My Publisher By Annemarie Schiavi Pedersen

It started with a tweet.

That’s how I got a publisher’s contract for my historical novel Celestina’s Burnings.

Sounds crazy, I know, but Twitter is a great resource for writers. It’s easy and a great way to get your pitch seen by the publishing world. Agents, editors and publishers are all over the website, searching for their next book.

I didn’t start out so enthusiastic, however. The thought of throwing out my pitch on social media made me cringe. Then, it came to me that if no one favored my tweet, my pride was all I had to lose. In that case I could always delete my pitch. No harm, no foul.

So, in a burst of bravery, I participated in a Twitter pitch party called #PitMad, where writers tweet a pitch for their completed, polished and unpublished manuscripts.

You should see this thing. Pitches come in from throughout the world, in different languages and alphabets. It’s so popular that it trends on Twitter all day long.

Believe me, I had very little hope that this one tweet would be the thing that finally kickstarted my dream. A dream ten years and a hundred rejections in the making.

During the one-day event, agents and editors and publishers make requests by liking/favoriting the tweeted pitch. Back then, a tweet had to be no more than 140 characters; now, you get 280. If your tweet is liked, you’re sent to the editor or publisher’s website to follow their particular guidelines for submission.

In my case, unbelievably, the publisher of Literary Wanderlust, a small traditional publisher located in Denver, liked my tweet. That was how the publishing contract for Celestina’s Burnings came about.

Now, before that tweet, I’d always followed the staid tradition of researching literary agents and then writing them formal email queries. Then, I’d wait.  Responses sometimes came quickly, or they’d take six weeks, or in many cases, an answer never came. When a response arrived, it was usually a “canned” rejection, which is understandable considering the volume of requests literary agents receive for representation.

On #PitMad, there is no one policing your manuscript. It’s just raw opportunity.

And if it works, #PitMad is a thing of beauty. Your pitch goes straight to a great publisher or editor.

 For those interested, there are a few simple rules to follow to get you started. Check out the #PitMad or #PitchWars website. Next #PitMad pitch parties are Sept.  5, and Dec. 5.

It’s still a wonder to me that Literary Wanderlust Publisher Susan Brooks somehow found, and then favored, my tweet.

The rest, I’m delighted to say, is history.

Annemarie Schiavi Pedersen’s historical novel Celestina’s Burnings will be released Jan. 1, 2020. Preorders available at Amazon and Literary Wanderlust in October 2019.

Review: Using Scrivener for Family History and Memoir Writing by Laura Hedgecock

“Because it’s known as a novel tool, I approached it from the standpoint of using it for Memoir and family history.”

What is Scrivener?

Scrivener is a writing software that helps writers organize research, notes, and drafts, or, as Scrivener puts it, “See the forest or the trees.” It can even help with story-boarding.

Note: This review is based on Scrivener 1 for Windows. Scrivener 3, a major update, has been available for MAC/iOS, but the Windows version is still in the works. Per email, a company representative stated that they hope to have Scrivener 3 to Windows users this summer.

To read the full article, click here.

Laura Hedgecock

Author, Blogger, Speaker

TreasureChestOfMemories.com

Laura@LauraHedgecock.com 

Writing in Detroit, about Detroit by Laura Bernstein

As a long-time Detroiter, one who is further (sometimes uncomfortably) compelled to write about her own life, it’s only natural that various aspects of Detroit seep into a great number of my personal essays/creative nonfiction and poetry. Sometimes Motown serves as a living, breathing background, the canvas upon which my own life stories play out, as is the case with a number of the personal essays that make up my forthcoming memoir-in-essays, Travelers. Other times, Detroit is the primary focus of a poem or essay. Such is the situation in my series, Detroit: Summer of 2017, currently running in The American Scholar’s Daily Scholar.
 
This series, comprised of six essays (or essaylets, since they’re on the shortish side), was, to my vast delight, my first experience with having my work solicited. It came about in this way: several years ago, before Travelers was even conceived of as a collection, I happened to write an essay I called True which focused closely on some of my personal experiences as a Detroiter—this in the tough years prior to bankruptcy, revitalization, etc. As a matter of course, I sent it to various journals for consideration, and it was picked-up by The American Scholar, a magazine I happen to adore.
 
However, due to an enormous backlog, The Scholar sat on that essay for near two years, so by the time they wanted to publish it, many aspects of Detroit had changed, and the essay had to undergo a revamping process. Finally, last winter, True (renamedTales of the Motor City by the editors) appeared in The Scholar’s print issue, and was also made available online. And when Managing Editor, Sudip Bose, invited me to send more work his way when it became available, I gladly did so, after allowing a decent few months to pass. That essay (titled Wild by me, but who knows what it will ultimately be called) is set to appear in the fall, 2017 print edition.
 
Then, at the start of the summer, I received an email from Mr. Bose inviting me to create a six-part series for The Daily Scholar, The American Scholar’s online magazine. He envisioned a sequence of short essays—maybe 600 words per piece—that would appear weekly or biweekly over the course of a couple of months. Other than these brief guidelines, he left the rest up to me, saying I was free to write these “postcards from Detroit” about whichever aspects of the city I chose to illuminate, in whichever way I desired. The field was utterly, totally wide open—and more than a little daunting.
 
And because this is Detroit, because nothing is simple here, my first essay came in at over 1400 words (eeks!), at which point Sudip gently inquired if I could shorten it a tad. Finally, I managed to shave off near 200 words (close to weeping all the while. I hate having to “kill my darlings,” no matter how often I’ve been enjoined to do so). Sudip was fine with that, and I sighed in relief. I then promised him that all my subsequent pieces would be under 1000 words—a promise I broke again and again, though not nearly so terribly as with the first of those essays.
 
Bless their hearts, I haven’t heard a peep from The Scholar about these ongoing transgressions. Perhaps they’ve just thrown up their hands in defeat. Or, maybe, just maybe, they’ve come to see what we Detroiters know in our bones—how unbelievably complex our truths are, how they shift depending on who’s naming them, what day it is, who’s our mayor, etc. And in this way,postcards simply cannot tell our whole story. Nor can a mere six essays, though, of course, the project was never intended to be the full and last word on the Motor City.
 
I’ve finished this series now, even as I’m waiting for the rest of the pieces to run. And though I’ve completed the task The Scholar asked of me, I’ve come to realize that I still have about a hundred more of these essaylets in me. So I guess I’d better get to writing… I’ll worry about what home they’re going to at a later date.

The 5 Ss That Will Help Get You Published by Katey Schultz

 

Flash fiction and flash nonfiction stories are often called “Stories of the Moment” or “Postcard Stories.” Think small, but fun, significant, and engaging. The challenge with flash form writing is how to write a compelling story that feels complete when you only have about 750 words to get the job done. One thing I like to use when I’m trying to figure out how to do that is what I call The Five Ss. For examples of how to apply the 5 S’s sign up for my newsletter and a downloadable PDF.

 

The first S is Setting. Pretty simple–your story needs to happen somewhere. It can be as simple as a sidewalk or a bedroom or a park, but events have to take place somewhere.

 

The second S is a Situation. Something needs to happen to your character (or you, in the case of memoir). Usually, the way that manifests is that there’s some sort of desire that gets thwarted. Whatever situation you come up with or are remembering, make it short, sweet, and try and get it into the first or second paragraph.

 

The third S is Sensory Detail. You have three pages to make the world feel absolutely vivid to your reader. The fastest way to do that is to evoke the five senses. Have fun with it, get a little weird and creative with your descriptions, and see how much you can pack in. (And there’s a follow-up lesson to this point, which I teach in my online classes, and it has to do with how writers can determine which details to leave in, which details to leave out, and WHY.)

 

The fourth S is a Simile. This could also be a metaphor of course, but the point here is that you make a comparison using like or as. This will enliven your sentences and it will also make the world appear more three-dimensional. It will reveal things about you or your character that maybe you didn’t even know until you wrote them down.

 

The fifth and final S is the Shift. It’s the most challenging, but it also has the highest payoff. Your character needs to shift or change by the end of the flash. Usually, that’s an internal change; it has to do with whatever desire that character has that’s been thwarted or that’s been rewarded. You want to make sure that you’ve got that shift in there to bring your story to some sense of a conclusion and allow it to speak to the larger human predicament. This is often also called the “so what factor” or, in some circles, writers say this is how we take the specific and make it universal.

 

When you’re all done, first–celebrate! That’s the best part; you’ve written a complete flash piece, you’ve got a nice first draft on your hands. Exhale and then go back to the beginning. Try reading it out loud to yourself. I always recommend that. Once you’ve done that, read it again to yourself. Go ahead and mark in the margins with your favorite pen, too. See if you have The Five Ss, and if you don’t, ask yourself where you can fit them in. Conversely, if you’ve got tons of sensory detail but your setting isn’t very clear, consider the balance of The Five Ss in your story and make adjustments accordingly.

 

After you’ve gone through that, share it with a friend, teacher, or writing group. Read some great examples in online magazines like SmokeLong Quarterly or Brevity, and see what you learn. Take a deep breath. Let time pass. Return again. Work with your story until it feels complete, then send it out for publication!

 

Katey Schultz’s story collection, Flashes of War, was awarded IndieFab Book of the Year and received a Gold Medal from the Military Writers Society of America. She has won more than half a dozen flash fiction contests, been awarded writing fellowships in 8 states, and is currently seeking a publisher for her novel set in Afghanistan. Her newest online program, Airstream Dispatches: a worldwide book club for writers, brings together a group of dedicated creatives who want accountability, craft-based instructional writing prompts, and the community of other writers to feel supported and “seen.” Explore her online classes, ecourses, and writing at www.kateyschultz.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What it’s like to write a novel based on another novel

By: Sarah Shoemaker

I’m sitting in my monthly book discussion group, and we are talking about Jane Eyre (every year we discuss one classic novel). The talk surrounds me, sometimes quite heated: what are we to make of Mr. Rochester? We all agree that Jane is independent, with a strong moral compass—so what is there about this man who is sometimes demanding and sometimes playful, who seems angry so much of the time (and who, though Jane doesn’t know it, keeps his mad wife hidden in a third floor apartment) that attracts the strong-willed Jane? Some say, “Sometimes people make terrible mistakes in love.” Others say, “Not Jane, she’s too smart, too independent, too morally driven to do that. There must be something she sees in him—she doesn’t even think he’s handsome.” (Though in the film versions he usually is.)

In all this, I am convinced of one thing—well, two, actually. One is that Charlotte Bronte knew what she was doing, and that we are meant to sympathize with Jane and Mr. Rochester. Does she not bring them together happily in the end? Is this not a clear indication of where Bronte’s sympathies lie? And the other thing is that someone ought to write Edward Rochester’s story; someone ought to help us understand him and why he acts and does what he does. The book discussion ends and I leave for home, but by the time I am halfway there I have challenged myself: I am going to write that book.

Easy to say! The first thing I do is buy a paperback of Jane Eyre, so that I will feel free to underline, write in the margins, dog-ear pages, and generally make a mess of this book. And as I read it—and re-read it—I pay special attention to the Mr. Rochester parts. I make flagrant use of colored post-its to flag noteworthy passages: pink for Jane and blue for Mr. Rochester (how traditional!), white for other characters, green for descriptions of places.

And then I read—and read—other novels by Charlotte Bronte and her contemporaries, and biographies of them as well. I read for language, for rhythms, for how people in early nineteenth-century England (and Jamaica and France) talked and how they lived.

After all this, I start to write Edward Fairfax Rochester’s life. And that is when I really come to understand that it is not going to be a piece of cake. Writing the story of a character who already exists on paper and in people’s minds is like writing the biography of an actual person.

Everything has to fit what the reader already knows—or thinks. If the reader is mistaken, the text has to gently show the reader how he/she has misunderstood. Even the slightest detail cannot be overlooked. At one point I am writing along, about to send Rochester to Jamaica, and in rereading the portion of Jane Eyre where Rochester tells about going there, I read a short phrase that had never caught my eye before: “When I left college . . .” Oh my gosh! He went to college? Why did I not notice that one little word: college. And everything stops while I research what college was like two hundred years ago. Or, more notably, everyone knows that Mr. Rochester kept his mad wife hidden in the attic. But was it really an attic, or was it simply a room (or a suite?) on the third floor, the same floor where the servants’ rooms were, but walled off from them so as to keep it secret? And, toward the end, when everyone who has read Jane Eyre already knows what happens, what’s to keep them reading? Unless of course there are things that Jane does not know . . .

 

*****

 

Sarah Shoemaker (better known to long-time DWW members as Sarah Wolf) has been a member of DWW for 30 years. Twenty years ago she moved from Livonia “up north” to the Leelanau Peninsula, where she recently re-discovered the joys and anguish of writing a novel. Mr. Rochester will be published May 9, 2017, by Grand Central Publishing (used to be Warner Books). Sarah has just been invited to be one of 5 authors to talk about her new book at the national convention of the American Library Association this summer in Chicago!

 

How Dark Fantasy Can Bloom into Light

by Veronica Dale

My friend Bob, who writes delightful comedy, once asked me why I write dark fantasy. I explained it was because I didn’t want to gloss over the fact that in real life bad things happen. But, I said, my books are also full of hope and always lead to a light at the end of the tunnel. I write what I do because, for many, life is not always a bowl of cherries.

It sure wasn’t for a woman I got to know when I was a pastoral minister at our church: Mary Rose. Hers was one of the first funerals I attended at the beginning of this year. I mention it because this dark event yielded up a real insight.

Our church pastor, and my former boss, stood up to give the homily and I wondered what he was going to say. Mary had been hammered by almost unbelievable losses in her life.

Three of her children were cut down as young adults – one after another, in spite of everything the doctors could do – by a rare form of cancer. Incredibly, another daughter was killed in a car accident on the way to her brother’s funeral. Then Mary’s husband succumbed to cancer. Things looked up a bit when Mary’s remaining son and his wife had two little boys. One, again incredibly, fell to his death while the family was visiting his grandparents in India. Another died as an infant from a fatal heart disease. Mary herself was killed as a result of a broadside accident while being driven home from visiting her remaining little family in North Carolina.

So Fr. Mike got up and addressed the son, daughter-in-law, and their now three children who were among the many others who attended Mary’s funeral. He reminded us that throughout all the years of grieving Mary held on to her faith and courage. “It is what it is,” she used to say, “and we move on.” She helped other bereaved families, did laundry for the homeless people sheltered in our church, and worked hard as a volunteer for our Christian Service Commission Then Fr. Mike put forth a remarkable thought. “Our losses,” he said, “can define who we become.”

That took some unpacking for me. But it reminded me of when we were in Italy and I saw Michelangelo’s enormously moving statue of the David. I don’t think I’ve ever been struck so hard by any other work of art. Yet, I learned, the David started out as a fairly nondescript block of marble, with a crack in it even. The sculptor worked away at it, determined, he said, to release the form inside. As more and more of the block got chipped off, David started to emerge. I’m sure if that block of marble were sentient, it would complain it didn’t want to be hammered, that it hurt to lose so much of itself. But slowly it became transformed, into one of the world’s most awesome sculptures. The chunks that it lost in some way defined what it became.

Such an insight, like life itself, can be both heart-breaking and beautiful. The dark can bloom into something full of light – like Mary of Magdala found out, like J.R.R Tolkien wrote about, like a lot of people discover even in the midst of grief.

Or like in my book Blood Seed, when Sheft discovers “It is what it is,” and makes the hard decision to move on. He, along with his brother in Dark Twin, and his beloved Mariat in the upcoming Time Candle, work their way through the same feelings of loss that many of us do. But we do it in the hope so well declared by Julian of Norwich in her Enfolded in Love: “All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.”

Vernie Dale is an established author with Detroit Working Writers, and a member of Phi Beta Kappa and the Alliance of Independent Authors. Her first fiction book, Night Cruiser, was published in December 2014, followed by Blood Seed and Dark Twin in 2016. She is a former librarian and has a background in pastoral ministry. If you’d like to join her email list – this blog is an example of what she sends out – sign up at her website http://veronicadale.com “I won’t spam you,” she promises, and reminds everyone they can unsubscribe at any time.

Film as Inspiration for Poetry

decillis_headshotBy Diane DeCillis

The editors of Poetry Foundation wrote that “In the last 100 years, perhaps no other artistic medium has provided more fodder for poetry than the cinema. Movies have become central to the poetic imagination, whether the poet celebrates the movies or reacts against celluloid saturation.”

There are various aspects of a film that can inspire the making of a poem, from identification with a character to concrete images that resonate. Poet Frank Bidart, discussing his poem that actually ends with a sentence by the actor Heath Ledger, says, “Crucial to getting a character to speak in a poem is hearing in your head as you write the way the character talks. Because a poem is made up of words, speech is how the soul is embodied. (Ledger asserts, of course, that even in a movie this is true.) What’s crucial is that how the words are set down on the page not muffle the voice. When I first began writing, writing the voice down in the ways conventional in contemporary practice seemed to muffle or kill the voice I still heard in my head. If I lost that voice, I knew I had lost everything. I’m grateful to Ledger for saying more succinctly than I have ever been able to what I had felt since I began writing.”

Poem Ending with a Sentence by Heath Ledger

 
Each grinding flattened American vowel smashed to
centerlessness, his glee that whatever long ago mutilated his

mouth, he has mastered to mutilate

you: the Joker’s voice, so unlike
the bruised, withheld, wounded voice of Ennis Del Mar.

Once I have the voice

that’s
the line

and at

the end
of the line

is a hook

and attached
to that

is the soul.

Choose a movie for inspiration the way you’d consider a piece of art for ekphrasis. What is it about the film that speaks to you? A good film, much like a fine poem, begins with shaping the of raw material. Perspective and emotional weight are further refined through editing. When it comes to revision in poetry, the objective is similar. How do we shape our words into something that succinctly tells the story, delivering maximum punch with a minimum of words?

I’ve written a number of poems inspired by movies. One refers to a love scene in Punch Drunk Love. The scene exquisitely captures the protagonist’s existential sense of feeling alone, odd, an outsider, and how he, in that moment, feels safe enough to risk revealing his deep inner-self. It’s a small moment of discovery that’s powerfully brought to life via the woman who “gets” him, and speaks his language. Like the experience of a good poem, it connects him to her, to the greater world, and to us. Here’s a poem of mine recently posted on the Great Lakes Commonwealth of Letters website:

decillis_front-book-cover-designPunch Drunk Love
—after the movie

A loner, prone to fits of rage, he lies on top,
his nose an inch away from hers, says,
“I want to smash your face, it’s so pretty

I want to smash it with a sledge hammer.”
There’s a long pause. Her eyes searching
as if to reach inside him. And I’m afraid

of what she’ll find, until I realize she heard it as
Your face is unbearably pretty. I’m scared of
the way it makes me feel. I watch his

reaction when she says, “I want to scoop out
your eyes and eat them.” How he hears
I love the way I see myself in you, I want that

inside me. They kiss like ice cubes melting
in Scotch, and I remember what it means
to be invisible, wandering the city,

an outsider even my mother never knew.
I walk down Grand River Avenue
along the Redford cemetery, a ghost

who cannot hide the scent that stray dogs
chase, the mix of fear and tough from
tramping in wilderness too big to mark.

In the movie they’re drawn to
each other like plastic kissing dolls–
as if each had been looking for

the other without knowing–and
I see myself–heart with the teeth
of a dog that never means to bite.

 

Want to learn more? Join me for an advanced poetry workshop I’ll be teaching for Springfed Arts this fall, where we’ll explore the relationships between imagery, imagination, and poetry through a variety of forms. One session will highlight film as a writing start. We’ll examine how the words on a page come to life through imagery, and further, how physical, emotional and intellectual imagination are highlighted through voice, and honed by revision. To register, visit springfed.org.